Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:43:21 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To:        John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, marino@freebsd.org, jwbacon@tds.net, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast
Message-ID:  <86sifzef1i.fsf@nine.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <54A05AB7.3020200@marino.st> (John Marino's message of "Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:32:07 %2B0100")
References:  <201410062016.s96KGZP8084850@svn.freebsd.org> <86r3vjg054.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A04955.3010601@marino.st> <86387zfur3.fsf@nine.des.no> <54A05AB7.3020200@marino.st>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > The original BLAST is at 2.2.26, while BLAST+ is at 2.2.30.
> so what?  a PORTEPOCH is matched to a specific package name.

Yes, and this name cannot be used for the original BLAST program without
bumping PORTEPOCH.  This port should have been named ncbi-blast-plus or
something similar.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sifzef1i.fsf>