Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 15:10:34 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports Tree Empty :-( Message-ID: <199512192310.PAA13592@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:41:41 CST." <v02130500acfcd354fe60@[199.183.109.242]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I just extracted the RELENG_2_1_0 branch from the -cvs tree. >The ports tree comes up totally empty. >I do not think that this is appropriate. >The (-stable) branch which this represents SHOULD have a full tree of >ports, even if they are not as up-to-date as the (-current) branch. > >---- >Richard Wackerbarth >rkw@dataplex.net The ports tree was never tagged. I think the idea was that the -current ports tree would continue to work for 2.1 systems. If that is not the case, then we've screwed up. If/When we decide to do something that will break this functionality, we should tag the ports tree. -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512192310.PAA13592>