Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:16:26 +0900 (JST) From: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Re: IPv6-enable ports Message-ID: <200001190916.SAA64161@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <vqc901nny8g.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <23769.947339891@coconut.itojun.org> <200001081738.CAA16033@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> <vqc901nny8g.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
asami> Yes, but the difference is that, today, we know that 3-stable is IPv4
asami> only while 4-current has IPv6. You can easily distinguish them with
asami> ${OSVERSION}.
asami> I don't think we need USE_INET6 unless you want people to be able to
asami> compile ports in -current without IPv6 support (and I already said I
asami> don't see a need for that, or rather, I don't want you guys to spend
asami> too much time on something like that).
Okay. I will get rid of 'USE_INET6' from all ports.
---
Munechika SUMIKAWA @ KAME Project / FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001190916.SAA64161>