From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 12:12:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE391065675 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D2D8FC1D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so2855396bwz.13 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:12:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=E543NKExT6xI7uUlYvOYRd0mfZT2QEd0ZX/WEhpmqg8=; b=cea+F8vnb2EsL6BjQZXcIL3EJq0ZQTXvrEisILARQAVp6wz37CQ4OyLIWCCc/PsmPb s1OmyV6eh8L+/TbU9B6wjkNlxf5/zLrhJqykCHLXCrn27cfLkOJ0Vr+JvvIhXkBrPchE ljWTQUTGddjxbdF7AliTbDsHWn3RaPG2Rq9HQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=TJRyiROROXMX+Qoqd94Gkb12JD0d2f4h3kTcr0Yunxx6jVcBZ1M8e18IKIme6nKhSH 8mJAYKveKN/N/mWQQ6874PjGHKnmzjQ9JahX3PXyIMY8KQMI0SYCMx4bCo7FwL+2nHNO 2QSk47dLAzHiq2YvTtL7C7VY9F0vxYCK8cdm0= Received: by 10.204.73.13 with SMTP id o13mr4839879bkj.173.1288008765330; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ua1.etadirect.net [91.198.140.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p34sm4759740bkf.15.2010.10.25.05.12.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:12:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikolaj Golub To: Pete French Organization: TOA Ukraine References: Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:12:42 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Pete French's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:55:34 +0100") Message-ID: <86wrp6jwsl.fsf@zhuzha.ua1> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:12:47 -0000 On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:55:34 +0100 Pete French wrote: >> You could change the values and recompile hastd :-). It would be interesting >> to know about the results of your experiment (if you do). PF> I changed the buffer sizes to the same as I was using for ggate, but the speed PF> is still the same - 44meg/second (about half of what the link can do) You can check if the queue size is an issue monitoring with netstat Recv-Q and Send-Q for hastd connections during the test. Running something like below: while sleep 1; do netstat -na |grep '\.8457.*ESTAB'; done Also tcpdump may help :-) -- Mikolaj Golub