Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:00:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com> Cc: Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files Message-ID: <20070701205906.G64506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125@mail.gmail.com> References: <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com> <b41c75520707010030u25497199p1ce6b91bd1f5287c@mail.gmail.com> <20070701202709.L64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > snapshot of a partition, in order to perform a background-fsck and >> > thus our website was down. So ufs2 does not scale well. > > Reasons not related to the nfs-server itself. FreeBSD itself was > rock-solid. It was firmware-related on the storage-side. > i always use software mirror concat or both in FreeBSD. always works, 10 times cheaper, fully portable and (yes true) comparable in speed. in some cases - faster.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070701205906.G64506>