Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:47:38 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADSUP: ports freeze delay
Message-ID:  <1110851258.6745.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <200503150240.43141.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References:  <20050314182412.GA29863@voodoo.oberon.net> <200503150240.43141.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-ObQcHSogPM7+F1X0kh/X
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 02:40 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 14. March 2005 19:24, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> > Since portmgr decided to get new Xorg version 6.8.2 into ports
> > before the freeze, we need some more time to test it than expected.
> >
> > Ports freeze is now scheduled to begin on March 21, 2005 and will
> > last 10 days.
>=20
> Uhm. According to marcus@'s last HEADS UP (Death, taxes, and...ports free=
ze),=20
> the ports-freeze was scheduled to begin on March 25th and take "at least =
two=20
> weeks". How exactly will a negative delay and shortening of period help X=
org=20
> getting tested?

I sent a follow up immediately after that.  I mistyped.  It should have
read March 15.

Joe

>=20
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-ObQcHSogPM7+F1X0kh/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCNj66b2iPiv4Uz4cRAl73AJ90UA6lTqwcPVKQZ+92FApKlDpKDwCfUXRk
iNrDHUln+j9StNqd1EHJkMo=
=TuBN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ObQcHSogPM7+F1X0kh/X--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1110851258.6745.14.camel>