From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  2 14:51:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B94A7D3
 for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  2 Nov 2014 14:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728F5CE0
 for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  2 Nov 2014 14:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA2Epjxp005095
 for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:51:45 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 194721] PR documentation wrong says it's okay to submit PRs to
 notify about newer versions in ports
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 14:51:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation
X-Bugzilla-Component: Documentation
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-194721-9-rTyuR8LciZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-194721-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-194721-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 14:51:45 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194721

Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aberg010@my.hennepintech.ed
                   |                            |u

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> ---
In addition to removal of that line, I would suggest that the third line:

If the port is maintained, PRs announcing new upstream releases are usually not
very useful since they generate supplementary work for the committers, and the
maintainer likely knows already there is a new version, they have probably
worked with the developers on it, they are probably testing to see there is no
regression, etc.

be reworded to say that portscout makes announcement of updates unnecessary,
but submitting patches to update ports instead of just announcing the update is
welcome.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.