Date: 21 Jan 2001 04:33:21 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: First vm_zone patch Message-ID: <xzpk87ph94u.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Jason Evans's message of "20 Jan 2001 12:42:06 -0800, Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:42:00 -0800" References: <xzpr91ydo85.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010120124200.O69199@canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> writes: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 08:20:58PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > The next step is to replace the simple_lock with a mutex, and add a > > top-level mutex to protect zlist. > FYI, I'm currently testing a patch that completely removes simplelocks. Does that mean I should give up reworking vm_zone? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk87ph94u.fsf>