Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:23:11 -0500
From:      Sean Cavanaugh <millenia2000@hotmail.com>
To:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: flash alternative
Message-ID:  <BAY126-W258F18D63BF29F586F4B2CCA8F0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>
References:  <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

From: millenia2000@hotmail.com
To: af.gourmet@videotron.ca
Subject: RE: flash alternative
Date: Tue=2C 8 Dec 2009 10:22:25 -0500



> Date: Tue=2C 8 Dec 2009 10:00:01 -0500
> From: af.gourmet@videotron.ca
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: flash alternative
>=20
> I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently
> more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers=3B and that
> it is "lighter" whatever that may mean.
> Anyone know anything about this?
> TIA
> PJ

if yer refering to "gnash" then yes it is lighter=2C but I have had issues =
where it does not work for every flash based website.

 		 	   		  =



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY126-W258F18D63BF29F586F4B2CCA8F0>