From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  8 15:23:12 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD74106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Dec 2009 15:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from millenia2000@hotmail.com)
Received: from bay0-omc4-s18.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc4-s18.bay0.hotmail.com
	[65.54.190.220])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188FA8FC0C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Dec 2009 15:23:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BAY126-W25 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s18.bay0.hotmail.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 
	Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:23:11 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY126-W258F18D63BF29F586F4B2CCA8F0@phx.gbl>
X-Originating-IP: [65.214.169.254]
From: Sean Cavanaugh <millenia2000@hotmail.com>
To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:23:11 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>
References: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2009 15:23:11.0680 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[5A879C00:01CA781A]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: RE: flash alternative
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:23:12 -0000


From: millenia2000@hotmail.com
To: af.gourmet@videotron.ca
Subject: RE: flash alternative
Date: Tue=2C 8 Dec 2009 10:22:25 -0500



> Date: Tue=2C 8 Dec 2009 10:00:01 -0500
> From: af.gourmet@videotron.ca
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: flash alternative
>=20
> I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently
> more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers=3B and that
> it is "lighter" whatever that may mean.
> Anyone know anything about this?
> TIA
> PJ

if yer refering to "gnash" then yes it is lighter=2C but I have had issues =
where it does not work for every flash based website.

 		 	   		  =