Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:48:44 -0400
From:      Kevin Wilcox <kevin.wilcox@gmail.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>, FreeBSD Questions List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Apache vs. nginx
Message-ID:  <CAFpgnrM-S88mMkNn2z1DQKwNZQm0i%2BUMi4ntMqjKkGOTJz44zg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207181118240.4799@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <35DA07557A36800645B39187@localhost> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207181118240.4799@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 18, 2012 5:19 AM, "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
wrote:
>>
>> I'm the admin for a small hobby website (Stovebolt.com - about 7 million
hits/mo).  We're fixin to buy a new server, and since I have to start from
scratch (install FreeBSD and all the needed ports), I'm wondering if anyone
on this list has switched from Apache to nginx.
>
>
> it depends of your needs.

This is a fantastic statement (I'm being serious, not facetious), because
it really does.

For specific purposes - serving static content with few bells and whistles,
dedicated PHP application servers for custom apps and stuff like Drupal, I
can't see ever going back to Apache. The nginx configs are too clean and
too simple.

For a large site with more complex authentication and access restriction
needs that are handled by the web server, I wouldn't drift from Apache -
not because I think nginx couldn't handle it but because I don't know if it
could and because I am less comfortable with saying I did it properly with
nginx than saying the same thing about Apache.

kmw



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFpgnrM-S88mMkNn2z1DQKwNZQm0i%2BUMi4ntMqjKkGOTJz44zg>