From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 09:21:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D3B106564A; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) Received: from comsys.kpi.ua (comsys.kpi.ua [77.47.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB80D8FC14; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pm513-1.comsys.kpi.ua ([10.18.52.101] helo=pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua) by comsys.kpi.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1T70w6-0008L1-NU; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:21:14 +0300 Received: by pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CE0251CC0B; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:21:13 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:21:13 +0300 From: Andrey Simonenko To: Pedro Giffuni Message-ID: <20120830092113.GA27015@pm513-1.comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua> References: <503ED6A1.1060902@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <503ED6A1.1060902@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Authenticated-User: simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua X-Authenticator: plain X-Sender-Verify: SUCCEEDED (sender exists & accepts mail) X-Exim-Version: 4.63 (build at 28-Apr-2011 07:11:12) X-Date: 2012-08-30 12:21:14 X-Connected-IP: 10.18.52.101:30900 X-Message-Linecount: 33 X-Body-Linecount: 18 X-Message-Size: 1173 X-Body-Size: 547 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Some updates to libc/rpc (second try) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:21:16 -0000 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:57:37PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > This is rather critical stuff (libc) so I have no hurry and would > like extensive testing before considering it for head. > > Please give it a try and report any issue. > Looks like that their getnetconfig.c and getnetpath.c have similar mistakes as these files have in FreeBSD. Detailed description of mistakes in these files and correct implementation: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165710 Related PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79683