From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Mar 31 11:05:46 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D285C3F17 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Received: from mail2.protonmail.ch (mail2.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "SwissSign Server Gold CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9NlZ1wsxz4vNt for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.kotowski@a9development.com) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:05:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a9development.com; s=protonmail; t=1617188744; bh=lcn7SIV/4P7xa1k1rL5jDlaQVJbOrA0qHFaeLXvj3y4=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NDzATgNtHWgAWY1l25tZCWC5GunXoA1N4yxUgwq9GzA0u3fFDzmpB3iLZ5nOCcBId hRpjtsOSSXG5PcqP8y80FiKjoQQhEldZMU8P3c2xFwEiFXUick5XPNZOcswdQEJ/OW zTZ2Rlx1fwWGi1EaKfV45jLFdgDWJzqol4XtBlks= To: Mark Millard From: Dan Kotowski Cc: Ian Lepore , =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Reply-To: Dan Kotowski Subject: Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64? Message-ID: <-YvpJdjIrp7HJ_d7ZGA6k9L6k2gtUogxqMTpulm8bhNzX-GJNoGS4zg9CwRpK7BxdeLzApgWueudWfYX9W9gmvnND0F31jkNlesiI4Tufd8=@a9development.com> In-Reply-To: References: <21BE83BC-0667-44F7-83E4-1664A2BC6017@icloud.com> <74C08272-D40E-42D2-A623-CEE12C661329@googlemail.com> <8d54c77b-b5bf-cdc9-7ed5-2bfb6504b388@spth.de> <0434D7DE-14A6-4B78-97C4-508C348DB891@googlemail.com> <9ee70ac3b117b6605ce67102c2864f24a2816d90.camel@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F9NlZ1wsxz4vNt X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:05:46 -0000 > > On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 22:52 +0000, Dan Kotowski wrote: > > > > > > `guess SFP+ would need more special driver-attention ... > > > > > > > > from quick reading around the web I guess the DPAA2 also needs a > > > > > > > > closed source binary blob. > > > > > > So this actually comes from NXP, not SolidRun. Linux already has > > > > > > some/most of what's needed, and the license is GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3- > > > > > > Clause so there's hope, but I haven't heard a peep from NXP and > > > > > > SolidRun doesn't really have the manpower to port to FreeBSD > > > > > > themselves. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/d= rivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/ > > > > That's actually very good news. If it's dual-licensed it can be > > > > included in freebsd without any drama. Still needs porting work, or > > > > maybe it could run using the linuxkpi stuff? > > The files there are a mix: a few list just: > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > or: > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > or: > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > or: > > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 / > > ( Kconfig Makefile dpaa2-ptp.[ch] dprtc-cmd.h dprtc.[ch] ) > > The others (most) list: > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) > > or: > > / SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */ > > The Copyrights seem to be Freescale Semiconductor Inc. and/or > > NXP when documented on a file. May be they would be willing > > to add the BSD-3-Clause where it is missing? > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > Mark Millard > > marklmi at yahoo.com > > ( dsl-only.net went > > away in early 2018-Mar) And if that fails, NXP documented everything pretty well: https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/DPAA2UM.pdf