Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Nov 2001 03:35:20 +0100
From:      "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
To:        "Greg Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>, "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Mysterious boot during the night
Message-ID:  <034101c16fd9$aebc31c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References:  <20011117130052.B7072@mars.thuis> <020e01c16f42$14885c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20011117015632.B87944@xor.obsecurity.org> <02a001c16f53$215323b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3BF63DB1.1070008@owt.com> <02a701c16f5e$a9cb0c70$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <020e01c16f42$14885c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20011117015632.B87944@xor.obsecurity.org> <02a001c16f53$215323b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3BF63DB1.1070008@owt.com> <20011118102106.C72712@monorchid.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg writes:


> Considering he's running a different processor
> and is keeping it 100% busy, this seems fine.

I've been experimenting, and the processor seems to stabilize at around 48
degrees Celsius when it is 100% busy.  When the system is idle, it cools off
considerably.

> The processor managed 54 hours or so of seti@home.
> It crashed during> a cron job.  I don't think I'd
> blame seti@home.

That is my assessment also.  SETI is very repetitive, I believe.  A code
failure, or even a hardware failure exposed by the program, would show up in
considerably less than 50 hours.  Fifty hours of running time is around 270
trillion instructions executed.

> The disks are the obvious thing to look at, since
> seti@home keeps RAM busy as well.

That also occurred to me.  Both memory and processor--especially the latter--are
well exercised by SETI, as far as I can tell.  So the only thing that gets
intermitted exercise is the disk.  SETI doesn't seem to do a lot of disk I/O,
except to take an occasional checkpoint.  And then there is that mysterious
coincidence of the cron job running at the moment of failure.

> Now we're getting closer.  There were problems
> with IDE data corruption and the VT82C686B.  sos
> committed a fix to -CURRENT about 2 months ago:

How can I tell if this fix is in my machine?  I installed from a set of Wind
River CDs, marked as FreeBSD 4.3 (without much additional information), and
dated April 2001.

> He doesn't appear to have MFCd to -STABLE.

MFCd?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?034101c16fd9$aebc31c0$0a00000a>