From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:39:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03703106566B for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from icemaca@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00C8FC1D for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1479245bkc.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:39:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TmkpLRkkeVQGrQP2MzVip2as/l+cxInU18gL2rEzuwo=; b=UAFMSCjGUrllzxW5V9dmPlkY8MU5TDkMGZzdB2kIOCXhkZBYzoMMdP8+ktZhieHPZ+ Qbpq6IYHIKMZyYmDAASedA6LRqph/nd97QO13jY3ZYnxcu2oW4bMvhkr/CReDc7DZCrI 4uJ60u6IiJxzieiMspvCjCgHNGYRha1Vz0vgosPZfayR6oJVzukxnHhKVNDVZLdSHvtL VXJmwQnqz5UuAMjwhbwoLe/kySFFEpkW9c7rKBpiNuA3ll0P6W09M99uIYfz0t5bTRZy 86uYn9/UNcCmM41Qzn5J+ZeLjPe4eJcPsEmyuhI7rhnDAuUFbI+81ON7XIzUExExz4+y +nWg== Received: by 10.204.151.81 with SMTP id b17mr6239437bkw.17.1332952795226; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([85.232.210.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm7794074bki.7.2012.03.28.09.39.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F733ED8.6080008@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:39:52 +0200 From: icemac User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F731B60.7020207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: need info builing ports properly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:39:57 -0000 On 03/28/12 17:30, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, icemac wrote: > >> I only ever had this option set >> >> CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > > Setting that in make.conf is counterproductive. First, those are the > defaults, so they don't improve anything. > > Second, that overrides settings made elsewhere. Consider a port like > Gimp, which wants to use special CFLAGS for better performance. But > it can't, because make.conf forces those CFLAGS. > Ok, thanks. i had misunderstood the procedure then.