From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 25 13:41:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from kerouac.deepwell.com (deepwell.com [209.63.174.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51A4615B42 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 13:41:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from terrye@deepwell.com) Received: (qmail 24696 invoked from network); 25 May 1999 21:20:12 -0000 Received: from file.dcomm.net (HELO terry) (209.63.175.10) by deepwell.com with SMTP; 25 May 1999 21:20:12 -0000 Message-Id: <4.1.19990525133058.00a41680@mail1.dcomm.net> X-Sender: terrye@mail1.dcomm.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:36:25 -0700 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Terry Ewing Subject: DSL over ATM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, We're looking into offering DSL to our customers. We have two choices on how to do this. We could add an ATM card to our Cisco 7000 to do the PVC's on the ATM circuit, or we could build a FreeBSD box, get an ATM card, and go from there. Id like to know which is preferable. I know nothing about ATM, or DSL, but another issue comes up; we need to assign IP addresses with DHCP over the ATM circuit. Some customers may only be allowed one IP address while others may be allowed more. Using FreeBSD for this would seem more robust, but I'd like to get opinions from you all Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message