Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 04:46:40 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Studded <Studded@san.rr.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Things I'd like to see in 2.2.6 Message-ID: <l03130304b1145ebefab5@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <34EE2B73.BCDD3D78@san.rr.com> References: <l03130303b11380fee173@[208.2.87.4]> <l03130300b113aab6ae9b@[208.2.87.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:18 PM -0600 2/20/98, Studded wrote: > Pardon me if I misunderstood, but I read that response as hostile. I >did read the documentation, and I took pains to indicate that there were >no big problems. Perhaps my tone was a bit hostile. I apologize. I did not interpret your message in the same manner. To me, it indicated that I needed to take ACTIVE intervention to get it to work. I was expecting to have to add a "-lxxx" to the library flags in the Makefile, or something of similar complexity. > I'm sorry if I didn't make myself sufficiently clear. I >wanted anyone who took the project on to know that there were some small >nits that might need to be worked out since I don't have enough >programming experience to know if they matter or not, and I'd like to >think that the project would prefer to ship code that compiles without >warnings. We could add a message to "Ignore Warnings". OTOH, I suspect that the authors would be happy to accept diffs which reduce the number of warnings. Such contributions would help not only FreeBSD, but everyone else. Richard Wackerbarth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03130304b1145ebefab5>