Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:28:49 -0400 From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Last commit to HEAD Message-ID: <CAKYr3zw-dFvKyd1A6w58EEBXX-wFEF7utm8dEA8pWJ25OjshDw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130416021704.GK1404@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <CAKYr3zy9jysc9U1qXs-SFuwRpsc7JX30LQi-jAKLmOyRW%2B13Tg@mail.gmail.com> <20130416021704.GK1404@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:17 PM, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:48:20PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > > Okay I must be loosing it since the change over to svn, and loosing cvsup > > > > where can i find the last commit to HEAD ? > > A couple of Web-oriented sources of information: > > * <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/current/svn-src-head.html>, which (as of > this writing) refers to "Apr 15 Andrey V. Elsukov svn commit: > r249528 - head/sys/netinet6". > > * <http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/>, which (again, as of this > writing) mentions "Directory revision: 249528 (of 249529)". > > > and is it correct to use > > > > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/ for 10.0-CURRENT srcs > > Mostly, though we now have some official mirrors, as well; you might want > to consider using one of those. And per > < > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#subversion-primer > >, > https is recommended for "anonymous checkout", e.g.: > "svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/head /usr/src" > > > making the last commit rev 249529 > > As of this writing, that was the last commit to the src repository. > However, that commit was to the "user" part of the repo, not to head. > (Ref. <http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/>.) > > > and as for 9.x i thought releng was what brought updates to the 9 tree > > releng/* is equivalent to the old RELENG_* CVS branches -- that is, > RELEASE_* + patches/commits to address security advisories. > > This is *not* what you want for "new features" (such as support for a > device that wasn't supported in RELEASE). > > > so why stable look like theres more current work, or is that going to > > become > > the life of 9.2 .... > > That's exactly the same as it was under CVS: "stable/*" is a development > branch, and that *does* get "new features" (ideally, all MFCed from > head), and (as of this writing) stable/9 is where code is committed that > will eventually become release/9.2.0, then releng/9.2. > > > trying to refresh my memory here! > > I hope that helps a bit. > > Peace, > david > Yupp Thanks for the refresher, im good now! > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Taliban: Evil men with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKYr3zw-dFvKyd1A6w58EEBXX-wFEF7utm8dEA8pWJ25OjshDw>