Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:40:28 GMT From: mistral@imasy.or.jp (Yoshihiko Sarumaru) To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/94312: [PATCH] desctiption and example mismatch Message-ID: <200603121540.k2CFeS6Q098689@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/94312; it has been noted by GNATS. From: mistral@imasy.or.jp (Yoshihiko Sarumaru) To: remko@FreeBSD.org Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/94312: [PATCH] desctiption and example mismatch Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:36:41 +0900 > Yoshihiko Sarumaru wrote: > > > >> Description: > > In nc(1), there are some examples presented, but in one exapmple, > > hostname are mismatch in description and command line. > > > > This PR related to docs/94158 > >> How-To-Repeat: > > man 1 nc > >> Fix: > > --- /usr/src/contrib/netcat/nc.1 Mon Jun 27 16:07:55 2005 > > +++ nc.1 Sat Mar 11 03:04:04 2006 > > @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ > > .Pp > > .Dl $ nc -s 10.1.2.3 example.host 42 > > .Pp > > -Send UDP packets to ports 20-30 of example.host, and report which ones > > +Send UDP packets to ports 20-30 of hostname, and report which ones > > responded with an ICMP packet after three seconds: > > .Pp > > .Dl $ nc -uvz -w 3 hostname 20-30 > > Hi, > > This is a somewhat difficult change i think. We have various > instances of "hostname" and various instances of "example.host". > > I would like to be consistent though and make them all "example.host" > which describes the items best. What do others think of this? I don't mind whichever, but I also feel something inconsistency to the both "hostname" and "example.host" are used. Regars, -- sarumaru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603121540.k2CFeS6Q098689>