From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 25 08:24:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CE01065675; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0F8FC23; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so94146eyd.7 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:24:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FrCzpjwCrhBdybh7LNmMwCwFKoUIrACo8Zz5rJiEoWQ=; b=HlLkJu1KBIM8Lz0BpXeoKKF1MsQZsu8qvyju0te0JoNOjMkK8+zwe7x3UdlzHXOVak vzlr02U7dlnKXmu3d4uEPx1bzNMHOg81VRyos4xTRg5jf5+JlhniAK9BLtPloNLfVBwk EqbARgMpqJALGgikp2AiqwaQ8oynO8/p0ux8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WFdxTO+PiZK3y3RE9EX9z1XTj7T6ZwrieTtx8oHpVHxr8frz9+1IK8CSMO+wX3Ig9S oibEW1Juz+uQrJQRKhrJPZo+XG5p+TrZ/UEOPzStPVv1CU1qYQs2Bar9SKBMua/ygGZx wqz4Tnd3STyGHdkgRxhvbqxsKoWjFR+mhPHBM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.82 with SMTP id 60mr707140wew.36.1245918267118; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:24:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4a4312cd.yWDVqdLjAXRTY5Bn%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> <200906240956.10625.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <4a4312cd.yWDVqdLjAXRTY5Bn%perryh@pluto.rain.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:24:07 +0100 Message-ID: To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: corky1951@comcast.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, tabthorpe@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:24:29 -0000 2009/6/25 : >> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and >> > internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"? >> >> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n. > > Anyone care for "intlzn"? =A0It's short, should still tab-complete > from "in", and it may be a bit less cryptic than nls, i18n, or l10n. I was thinking intl, but your suggestion's better. Chris --=20 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list?