Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:46:17 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/login Makefile login.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811111240160.23538-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.981111080605.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, John Polstra wrote: > It don't really think it makes any difference. BSDI's interfaces > are inferior to PAM's in several ways. One example: In the BSDI Some time back I was hunting for some PAM modules for Solaris and I discovered a variety of gratuitious differences between the Solaris and Linux PAM APIs. I didn't dig into who was at fault for these differences but am now wondering which FreeBSD's PAM be most compatible with (if either, or both). -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811111240160.23538-100000>