From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 21:45:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCD616A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:45:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.49.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1C343D45 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (pool-151-199-113-125.roa.east.verizon.net [151.199.113.125]) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1BLiwAO036371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:44:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (localhost.Chelsea-Ct.Org [127.0.0.1]) by zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1BLiqdx027314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:44:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: (from paul@localhost) by zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1BLiqq0027313; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:44:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org: paul set sender to paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu using -f From: Paul Mather To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050211190008.CCCA216A4E5@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050211190008.CCCA216A4E5@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:44:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1108158291.35921.11.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:45:01 -0000 On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:04:34 -0600, "Andrew L. Gould" wrote: > On Friday 11 February 2005 08:14 am, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > > cpghost@cordula.ws writes: > > > Imagine Linux dropping Tux for some meanlingless, lifeless logo? > > > > I'm glad you asked. > > > > Tux is a mascot, not a logo. These are Linux logos: > > > > http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topiccaldera.gif > > http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topicdebian.gif > > http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topicmandrake.gif > > http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topicredhat.gif > > http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topicsuse.gif > > http://images.slashdot.org/topics/topicturbolinux.gif > > > > > > > DES > > No Slackware? In my opinion, Slackware has the widest deviation in > professionalism between their logo and mascot. > > logo(s): > http://slackware.com/grfx/shared/logo.png > http://store.slackware.com/images/nav/s_topleft.png > > mascot (pipe-smoking penguin): > http://store.slackware.com/cgi-bin/store/slacklapel?id=E844B2UK:mv_pc=379 Quite a deviation indeed, especially considering their mascot is an obvious nod to the Church of the SubGenius (http://www.subgenius.com): the true purveyors of SLACK! ;-) Cheers, Paul. -- e-mail: paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu "Throw this posting against the wall RIGHT NOW!" --- J. R. "Bob" Dobbs