From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 10 05:33:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4678A49 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4234ED87 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3ED511B82; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:33:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from Peter-Grehans-MacBook-Pro.local (c-67-190-11-104.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.190.11.104]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.2.4-GA) with ESMTP id BKN09690 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:33:34 +1000 Message-ID: <513C1B2C.9080707@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:33:32 -0700 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving bhyve to head References: <50ECFD6C.4000408@freebsd.org> <513C0515.4050603@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <513C0515.4050603@mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:33:38 -0000 Hi Alfred, > Peter, bhyve has been a huge boon and very successful for many of us. Great to hear ! > A few people have asked me if the code will be available in -stable soon. The initial plan was to not do this - it seemed a lot of work in addition to the massive TODO list. Also, we weren't sure how stable the interfaces would be. But, I'm not going to stop anyone who is willing to do the backport :) > Is that possible? Can I help in any fashion? Absolutely possible. All early development was done on 8.1. I think most of the relevant host bits (FPU/AVX save/restore) have now been MFC'd thought there might be some more required. rpaulo@ is already doing some work on this - you may wish to coordinate with him. later, Peter.