From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 09:17:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9061065687 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from relay.sw.ru (mailhub.sw.ru [195.214.232.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3138FC2F for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vova@sw.ru) Received: from vbook.fbsd.ru ([10.30.1.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay.sw.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m988e01j028671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:40:01 +0400 (MSD) Received: from vova by vbook.fbsd.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KnUaO-0005yu-0w; Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:40:00 +0400 From: Vladimir Grebenschikov To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <48EC67FF.3030900@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20070518192007.6e6a91e1@kan.dnsalias.net> <20070519022016.2b4a6bda@kan.dnsalias.net> <48EC67FF.3030900@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:39:59 +0400 Message-Id: <1223455199.1864.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Sender: Vladimir Grebenschikov X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:29:32 +0000 Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 4.2.0 is coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:17:37 -0000 On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 07:57 +0000, O. Hartmann wrote: > Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:20:07 -0400 -------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > >> HEADS UP: I will start importing GCC 4.2.0 bits in about one hour and > >> plan to finish in a couple of hours after that. > >> > >> The src/ tree will be utterly broken meanwhile. I'll send an 'all > >> clear' message when done. > > > > Done. > > > > Just for those who aren't on the cutting edge: why gcc 4.2.0 and not > 4.2.1 as it is used in 7.X? Looks like very outdated messages were delivered from spool. > Regards, > O. -- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov vova@fbsd.ru