Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Feb 2013 01:18:17 -0500
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, bug-followup <bug-followup@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: kern/175674: sem_open() should use O_EXLOCK with open() instead of a separate flock() call
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxgkAXRttQZWDDbuinT5cEdWZkfo8M64EdbNjM3ArZ5Bj=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201302030530.r135U1HP013561@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <201302030530.r135U1HP013561@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 February 2013 00:30, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> wrote:
>  Jilles and David, do you think this patch looks ok for libc?

Why bother keeping the contents of the #if 0?  Remove it.  Then it
looks good to me.


-- 
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkAXRttQZWDDbuinT5cEdWZkfo8M64EdbNjM3ArZ5Bj=A>