Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:36:03 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <5058A2F3.8020803@coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> <75ca1e92e2a51857615e193434898bf5@homey.local> <CAHu1Y70vLTQaGLQd_S65cyQe6RErgXJg2iy9VUDr9z6xXKwqyQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig21F377B0E73455333187EC7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18-09-2012 14:00, Michael Sierchio wrote: > We are really behind the curve here. Git assumes (correctly) that > disk space is inexpensive, much cheaper per byte than network > bandwidth. By the time we adopt SVN completely, every serious project > I know of will have moved from subversion to git. ;-) I have both a git and svn checkout of FreeBSD current and while git contains the full history it takes up less disk space (about 30%): 540M .git 759M .svn --------------enig21F377B0E73455333187EC7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBYovkACgkQfoCS2CCgtisesQD+Jz4ZyZ8z41FRST8bWMVy56Sm +yp5Ohb5jTpTd5GiBNkA/jAqHq1EswtfH8OdFGbdoSGfC4BKk9MtX8Abl0saw1Sr =z6bv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig21F377B0E73455333187EC7F--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5058A2F3.8020803>