Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Jan 1996 12:38:59 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Joseph D. Orthoefer" <j_orthoefer@tia.net>
To:        Peter Berger <peterb@telerama.lm.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: COMPAT_43 ... what breaks?
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.3.90.960103123132.5944A-100000@colossus.tia.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960103100031.13067A-100000@ivory.lm.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
With 2.0-RELEASE I got a little crazy and took that and almost everything
else that "seemed" non-essential out of a kernel, and ttyname stopped
working.  Really screwed wtmp, and everything that depended on the tty
info therein.  That was the most annoying thing, and is the only thing I
distinctly remember breaking. 

On Wed, 3 Jan 1996, Peter Berger wrote:

> 
> So just what -will- break if you compile a kernel without COMPAT_43?  
> Inquiring minds want to know.
> 
> 
> "The law locks up both man and woman/Who steals the goose from off the common
> But lets the greater felon loose/Who steals the common from the goose." -anon
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Peter Berger - peterb@telerama.lm.com - http://www.lm.com/~peterb
> 
> 

Joseph D. Orthoefer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.90.960103123132.5944A-100000>