From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Jan 21  3:20: 0 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D4815458
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 03:19:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar)
Received: (from fpscha@localhost)
	by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA15446;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:20:11 -0300 (GMT)
From: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
Message-Id: <200001211120.IAA15446@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
Subject: Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit?
In-Reply-To: <000101bf63e9$76352f30$01000000@madman> from Bob Madden at "Jan 21, 0 02:28:10 am"
To: bobm@atgsystems.com (Bob Madden)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:20:10 -0300 (GMT)
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik <fpscha@via-net-works.net.ar>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Has anyone tried stream.c against CISCO, Nortel, etc. routers?

Althoug off-topic, their (unofficial) vulnerability status would be 
very helpfull?

TIA!

En un mensaje anterior, Bob Madden escribió:
> I'm grateful for the efforts put forth in finding a reliable means of
> prevention to this attack. I have seen it's effects. For the benefit of those
> working on the solution, I wanted to share what I see when the attack is in
> full swing:

Fernando P. Schapachnik
Administración de la red
VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A.
fernando@via-net-works.net.ar
(54-11) 4323-3333


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message