From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 25 14:28:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from cerberus.charnocks.net (cerberus.charnocks.net [209.197.192.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A7015311 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 14:28:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from charnock@cerberus.charnocks.net) Received: from localhost (charnock@localhost) by cerberus.charnocks.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18882; Tue, 25 May 1999 16:28:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:28:25 -0500 (CDT) From: "William R. Charnock" To: Terry Ewing Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DSL over ATM In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990525133058.00a41680@mail1.dcomm.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We opted to buy the Cisco router. It was about 22K or so for a 7206VXR w/300MHZ NPE, 128MB DRAM, 20MB Flash, FastEther on the IO controller, and the PA-A3-T3 ATM card. We have been using it for a couple of weeks now and things seem to be working well. On Tue, 25 May 1999, Terry Ewing wrote: > Hello, > We're looking into offering DSL to our customers. We have two choices > on how to do this. We could add an ATM card to our Cisco 7000 to do the > PVC's on the ATM circuit, or we could build a FreeBSD box, get an ATM card, > and go from there. Id like to know which is preferable. > > I know nothing about ATM, or DSL, but another issue comes up; we need to > assign IP addresses with DHCP over the ATM circuit. Some customers may > only be allowed one IP address while others may be allowed more. Using > FreeBSD for this would seem more robust, but I'd like to get opinions from > you all > > Thanks > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message