From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 19:38:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0FF16A4CE; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (adsl-68-122-2-18.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.2.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FA943D2F; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:38:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i143cWmu004081; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:38:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i143cWlu004080; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:38:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:38:32 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Wartan Hachaturow Message-ID: <20040204033832.GA3952@VARK.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Wartan Hachaturow , freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG, jmallet@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20040203213613.GA28189@mojo.tepkom.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040203213613.GA28189@mojo.tepkom.ru> cc: jmallet@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCCS and batch environment utiltites. X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 03:38:36 -0000 On Wed, Feb 04, 2004, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > SCCS is interesting only as a way to retrieve code from > old repositories and reinject in some modern scs -- is > it worth importing, for example, MySC (which is, contrary > to the GPL-ed CSSC, under public domain) and doing the > hard (C++) work on bringing it to the conformance? TeamWare (developed by Larry McVoy before he wrote BitKeeper) is a modern source code management system that is built on top of SCCS. (It's a really big hack, but it does some distributed branching really well, and CVS doesn't.) The point is that there are still legitimate uses for SCCS. That said, I don't see any reason SCCS has to be in the base system unless FreeBSD is actively seeking POSIX certification. By the way, I believe Juli was working on porting the 4BSD SCCS to FreeBSD, but I don't know what her eventual purpose for it is.