Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:17:19 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
Message-ID:  <20040207111719.GB46350@FreeBSD.org.ua>
In-Reply-To: <xzp8yjf4061.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <20040206222812.818607303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040206223417.GA58750@xor.obsecurity.org> <xzp8yjf4061.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 12:08:22PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:28:12PM -0500, Tinderbox wrote:
> >> =3D=3D=3D> accf_http
> > AFAIK modules are not yet supported on amd64..the tinderbox shouldn't
> > try building them.
>=20
> They usually build fine.  If the tinderbox isn't supposed to build
> them, GENERIC and NOTES should have 'makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE=3D""'
>=20
NO_MODULES is better.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
FreeBSD committer
ru@FreeBSD.org

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAJMk/Ukv4P6juNwoRAq9TAJ9+toiZAZK/W3R8MXjzjSML4B1yYACfeXkl
tv5MKhH/0uUd3NJuuWQZF6A=
=qvWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040207111719.GB46350>