Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:35:59 +0800
From:      Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/154859 (www/uzbl) forgotten -- and now superseeded
Message-ID:  <AANLkTin0QGViEjYO55MerUZ45iSHODr-TfGk2f-289nZ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110315123015.GA66541@kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk>
References:  <20110315123015.GA66541@kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
am about to commit this update tonight.

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Klaus T. Aehlig <aehlig@linta.de> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> almost a month ago I submitted ports/154859, a maintainer update of
> www/uzbl
> to the then up-to-date release. Nothing has happend so far, and in the mean
> time a new version has been released and I'm currently testing the updated
> port; I expect so send a PR in the next days. Now I wonder, whether I
> should
> prepare the diff under the assumption that ports/154859 gets committed
> first
> (which would be good, to have a complete history in the ports tree!), or
> whether I should asume that ports/154859 will never get handled and send a
> patch with respect to the currently commited version.
>
> Best regards,
> Klaus
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin0QGViEjYO55MerUZ45iSHODr-TfGk2f-289nZ>