Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:35:59 +0800 From: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/154859 (www/uzbl) forgotten -- and now superseeded Message-ID: <AANLkTin0QGViEjYO55MerUZ45iSHODr-TfGk2f-289nZ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110315123015.GA66541@kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk> References: <20110315123015.GA66541@kta1c10.sesnet.soton.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
am about to commit this update tonight. On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Klaus T. Aehlig <aehlig@linta.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > almost a month ago I submitted ports/154859, a maintainer update of > www/uzbl > to the then up-to-date release. Nothing has happend so far, and in the mean > time a new version has been released and I'm currently testing the updated > port; I expect so send a PR in the next days. Now I wonder, whether I > should > prepare the diff under the assumption that ports/154859 gets committed > first > (which would be good, to have a complete history in the ports tree!), or > whether I should asume that ports/154859 will never get handled and send a > patch with respect to the currently commited version. > > Best regards, > Klaus > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin0QGViEjYO55MerUZ45iSHODr-TfGk2f-289nZ>