Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:51:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: wilko@freebsd.org Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>, alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-20000719-RC#2 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007211551340.8451-100000@semuta.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20000722002331.B22611@freebie.demon.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I'd go for a an ES40 too.... On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Mike and I had hoped to use the 4100 to debug this problem. > > > > But it isn't usable yet. > > > > The 4100 is perfectly usable. The issues are entirely in the installer and/or > > the boot blocks. > > Yes, that is what I wrote and experienced myself. > > > > 4100 makes a good release builder once installed via another machine.. > > > > TurboLaser, even with a slower CPU, actually makes a better one. > > And a noisier one ;-) But I'd go for the ES40. > > -- > Wilko Bulte http://www.freebsd.org > wilko@freebsd.org http://www.nlfug.nl > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10007211551340.8451-100000>