Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:53:45 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
Cc:        "Craig Shaver" <craig@ProGroup.COM>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES 
Message-ID:  <199607200053.RAA04779@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:27:41 PDT." <9607200027.AA14374@gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From The Desk Of "Marty Leisner" :
> I really get miffed hearing people laud the robustness of NT and OS/2...I fou
nd
> both pale to current copies of linux and FreeBSD.
> 

Well, it depends on  your point of view. Yes Linux and FreeBSD are probably
more robust than NT or OS/2 however from a DOS and Win3.1 point of view
NT is rock solid 8)


	Regards,
	Amancio








Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607200053.RAA04779>