From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 11:06:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFED216A4CE; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.162.142.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E41A43D81; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:04:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 52AC32285A; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:04:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:04:10 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Mathieu Arnold Message-ID: <20040119190410.GB72147@droso.net> References: <200401191544.i0JFib85052132@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119163258.GB4722@dragon.nuxi.com> <359167705.1074533881@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net> <20040119184544.GB6433@dragon.nuxi.com> <2549890.1074541889@pouet.in.mat.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2549890.1074541889@pouet.in.mat.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.2-RELEASE cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:06:27 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:51:29PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-Le 19/01/2004 10:45 -0800, David O'Brien =E9crivait : > |=20 > | Well, I guess that opens up a discussion then. I don't use many "p5" > | ports, but I certainly do use SpamAssassin daily. So I hadn't noticed > | that they go against the Porters Handbook and 'portlint'. It is > | important to keep things all in the proper section so a user like me can > | know what dependencies there are. Often I install dependencies from a > | precompiled package before I add local patches to the "leaf" port that I > | ultimately want installed. >=20 > Well, portlint will complain if you do things badly, but it won't complain > when you do just that. > perl ports have been done this way for ages, I mean, the normal > dependencies at the right place, and the dependencies depending on perl > version at the end. I was told it was the right way to do it when I began > updating ports, so I though it was the right way. >=20 I'd say it's the only way, so unless someone finds a better way to make dependencies conditional, this is the right way. make -V RUN_DEPENDS will give you the dependencies you want after evaluating the conditions. I would recommend using this instead of reading the raw Makefile. --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFADCoqqy9aWxUlaZARAsiyAKDio6VLcBY1ei6ZwjTrqtnXJCI8jQCdE/Ui 59mUYcsjxXJbfrJ18tQGnFs= =uuqf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--