From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 30 16:18:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDF116A41A for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445F413C46C for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6316D5C37; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:18:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk Received: by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix, from userid 1020) id E9DBF5C34; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:18:38 +0200 From: Milos Vyletel To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20070730161838.GA95831@rulez.sk> References: <20070721174631.S561@10.0.0.1> <20070727132640.GA6877@rot26.obsecurity.org> <20070727133342.GA12179@rulez.sk> <200707291552.57528.peter@wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707291552.57528.peter@wemm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status, invalid load, buildkernel times. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:18:45 -0000 On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:52:57PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Friday 27 July 2007, Milos Vyletel wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:26:40AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:48:32AM +0200, Milos Vyletel wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:06:20PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Please abandon the original patch and try this one: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/topology.diff > > This should fix it once and for all. I have tested it on amd64. I have > compile tested on i386 (an old laptop), but not booted it on an i386 > smp box - I dont have one. > > As such, I'd very much appreciate any confirmation from i386 users that > it works. Both from HTT and non-HTT users. Please check that > sysctl kern.sched.topology is right. On an Athlon64 X2 or dual-core > opteron, it should be "0". A HTT p4 or xeon should be non-zero. It > should be the same in both i386 and amd64 mode. This is just "works for me". But it is also amd64 machine. kern.sched.topology is correctly set to 0.