Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 19:16:49 +0000 From: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/gd marked as broken? Message-ID: <91eccaaf-248b-836d-ae6e-9b9b7f31065c@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <0dc2dd7c-020f-101d-1f76-0b2ad1f3bac0@gjunka.com> References: <dd7fa8d4-45b3-3242-9757-9e852931619a@gjunka.com> <19ccaf07-1c70-1372-f507-acdad19917f1@utanet.at> <0dc2dd7c-020f-101d-1f76-0b2ad1f3bac0@gjunka.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/08/2016 19:11, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 20/08/2016 16:23, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >> The port is not broken, it compiles in port and with poudriere. >> Only if option WEBP is set to on it is broken. >> >> look with >> >> poudriere options -C -jhailname graphics/gd >> >> how is it set, and change it if is to on. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > So, poudriere lies then, it says it's broken: > > [00:01:21] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Starting build of graphics/gd > [00:01:21] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Finished build of graphics/gd: > Ignored: is marked as broken: circular dependencies > > Greg Sorry, I should have been clearer. I know the port isn't broken, I just don't understand why poudriere says it's marked as broken if, according to you, it's a circular dependency and the port isn't marked in any way? Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91eccaaf-248b-836d-ae6e-9b9b7f31065c>