From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 19:22:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2849D16A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:22:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.snowfall.se (guldivar.globalwire.se [212.112.184.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED4C43D4C for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:22:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@snowfall.se) Received: by mail.snowfall.se (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3946524; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.snowfall.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3459BD for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Cars To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040913211740.Y71085@pluring.snowfall.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:22:19 -0000 Hi! I read the article on sys admin magazine (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding High-Performance Network Applications. This article is from 2001 and covers FreeBSD 4.2. Anyhow, FreeBSD ended last which feels quiet strange, is there anyone that has any new benchmarking data on how FreeBSD 5 compares ? / Stefan -- Stefan Cars Snowfall Communications http://www.snowfall.se Tel: +46 (0)18 430 80 50 - Direct: +46 (0)18 430 80 51 Mobile: +46 (0)708 44 36 00 - Fax: +46 (0)708 44 36 04