Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:48:11 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org.ru> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: READ PLEASE if your port uses BerkeleyDB (db3, db4, db41) Message-ID: <20031014134811.GB39789@freebsd.org.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031014112134.GA18306@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <20031014112134.GA18306@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:21:34PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > as some of you know, I am currently maintaining the db4, db41, > db41-nocrypto and bogofilter ports, among others. > > Just symlinking things into /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.X.Y might not work > since the library SONAME does not match then -- or can we have a file > /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1/lib/libdb.so when its SONAME is in fact > libdb41.so.1? > > Does anyone see a good way out? Suggestions, thoughts are solicited. > > > For reference, here are the libdb "consumers" and "providers": Also postfix/postfix-current and oops may use db3/db4/db41 ports. I have a idea about split everyone db* port into 3 ports: db-devel, db-doc and db-tool, because more (all?) dependences ports do not use documentation and application from db port. -- Rgdz, /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / AGAINST HTML MAIL http://ozz.pp.ru/ X AND NEWS / \
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031014134811.GB39789>