From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 13 13:41:27 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05CD16A401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0B413C46E
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7C52095;
	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:41:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DF72085;
	Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:41:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 8D936B88E; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:41:20 +0100 (CET)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
References: <45F388D4.2080900@elischer.org> <45F45172.8070601@elischer.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:41:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: <45F45172.8070601@elischer.org> (Julian Elischer's message of
	"Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:58:58 -0700")
Message-ID: <86r6rt6z27.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: netstat wierdness?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:41:27 -0000

Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes:
> answering myself..
> comes from having options LOCK_PROFILING in my kernel.
> adding the same to /etc/make.conf and recompiling netstat and libkvm help=
ed.
> (not sure if both are needed)

This is very bad.  LOCK_PROFILING should have no visible effect on
userland.  That is precisely what xinpcb, xunpcb, xtcpcb etc. are for:
to isolate userland from kernel structures.  They should not contain
any locks or anything else which would be affected by LOCK_PROFILING
or other kernel options.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no