From owner-cvs-all Wed Dec 9 15:59:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA15454 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 15:59:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA15442 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 15:59:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sprice@hiwaay.net) Received: from localhost (sprice@localhost) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id RAA20231; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 17:59:03 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 17:59:02 -0600 (CST) From: Steve Price To: Warner Losh cc: Archie Cobbs , Robert Nordier , vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem reports In-Reply-To: <199812092337.QAA47029@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Warner Losh wrote: # Maybe we should call for volunteers to have *ALL* bugs of a category # assigned to them and then reassign them to others if they aren't # trivial. Have a different person for bin, kern, etc. # # Comments? This reminds me of what I perceived Poul was trying Poul was trying to accomplish by moving things into the feedback state. I would much rather have the easy ones proudly display a [PATCH] or something along those lines in their synopsis. The problem with assigning a PR to someone is that if they don't take care of it for any number of reasons (too much work, personal problems, etc.), it tends to scare off anyone else that is cruising the PR database looking for something to do. # BTW, what's the bug rate these days? Poul used to have something that displayed this kind of info, but alas it seems that now it is defunct. :( -steve # Warner # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message