Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:25:48 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Upcoming change in dependency registration Message-ID: <d693eed46de56ab28dac4843a0bf3512@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <54C17EDF.40908@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150122180912.GE81001@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <7996d75b9d724f65af7dd3f63033eb03@ultimatedns.net> <54C17E8B.1060400@FreeBSD.org>, <54C17EDF.40908@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:51:11 -0600 Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> wrote > On 1/22/2015 4:49 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > > And in general, the ports tree is a single snapshot. It's only supported > > to build a port using the exact Mk/ it was checked-in as. > > For the record, I don't like this at all. It's one of my biggest gripes > about the ports framework. +1 > That's a separate discussion though. I'll be looking forward to that discussion. :) > > -- > Regards, > Bryan Drewery --Chris --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d693eed46de56ab28dac4843a0bf3512>