Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1996 20:05:06 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.mt.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of -stable Message-ID: <22242.834203106@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jun 1996 02:19:05 PDT." <199606070919.CAA21218@kachina.jetcafe.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Isn't that what the SNAPs are really for? Correct me if I'm wrong (and > who out there won't?) but aren't these supposed to be "more stable > snapshots" of -current? Exactly the opposite (please see the handbook entry on snapshots). They're made when we want to test something. > On a related note, software I deliver to customers is (usually) > accompanied by Q&A procedures. Is there *any* way to Q&A an entire > UNIX system in an automated fashion? One solution to the "-stable" Not really, no. Certainly not with our resources, anyway! Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22242.834203106>