Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:50:09 GMT From: vassily ragosin <vr@vrgraphics.ru> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/93504: sysutils/portupgrade: dependencies registered for java ports always assume jdk was built with a browser plugin. Message-ID: <200602180850.k1I8o9F3095633@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/93504; it has been noted by GNATS. From: vassily ragosin <vr@vrgraphics.ru> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, vr@vrgraphics.ru Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93504: sysutils/portupgrade: dependencies registered for java ports always assume jdk was built with a browser plugin. Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:48:00 +0300 You are right, this is not a problem with portupgrade, and it does gets solved by setting WITHOUT_WEB=yes for build of any jdk-dependent port. However, this looks like it is neither documented nor neat. What is the correct way to resubmit pr to java people? Close this one and make a new pr or someone with enough rights can recategorize the pr based on this new information?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602180850.k1I8o9F3095633>