Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:36:48 -0400
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
Cc:        svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r281075 - in stable/10: sys/conf sys/contrib/dev/acpica sys/contrib/dev/acpica/common sys/contrib/dev/acpica/compiler sys/contrib/dev/acpica/components/debugger sys/contrib/dev/acpica/c...
Message-ID:  <5526F0F0.7060507@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150409211121.GP8220@zxy.spb.ru>
References:  <201504041017.t34AHr5R059717@svn.freebsd.org> <20150408232131.GB1394@zxy.spb.ru> <FA6847C9-C057-4822-816A-08162033063E@FreeBSD.org> <20150409075538.GG8220@zxy.spb.ru> <20150409182807.GF1394@zxy.spb.ru> <5526D222.8030100@FreeBSD.org> <5526D3B8.3060900@FreeBSD.org> <20150409205639.GO8220@zxy.spb.ru> <20150409211121.GP8220@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 04/09/2015 17:11, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:56:39PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov
> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:32:08PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> `acpidump -d` work `acpidump -t` don't work
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From a quick look, it seems that your RSDT contains an
>>>>>>> entry with an address size which is neither 4 nor 8,
>>>>>>> and that leads to the assertion failure.  I am unsure
>>>>>>> whether there is any upstream fix for it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am not sure how long acpidump -t don't work.
>>>> 
>>>> addr_size must be 4 or 8 here.  Otherwise, something is
>>>> corrupting memory.
>>> 
>>> Sorry, I misread your message.  Please install
>>> sysutils/acpica-tools from ports, then do
>>> /usr/local/bin/acpidump and send me the output.
>> 
>> Host crashed
> 
> Captured inforamtion you can take here: http://zxy.spb.ru/acpi/

The last entry in your XSDT is actually empty.  Although it is not
clearly defined in the specification, I believe it should be skipped.
 I just committed a workaround on head (r281331) and it will be merged
to stable branches after 3 days.

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVJvDrAAoJEHyflib82/FGkocH/idaHJNEMb2FmD8fhqJItWP3
lIxGpRXL5TfLbou8GHkPOE7TDiSwnI41oQs6Ir70/pLhtEb4TNGe+U2XiVXNJrDX
4+22/oEOqbm7xrlXGrvfXnNvY2gJYGRWijohdmjLq2ciMXiUEL1bG9YUQSd4IXFV
EQIpVl5mw3AUUK7a22AOMSg2o/+BAuVDpPkgmZyHYDghAv6wb1kWx9GxAEsyVQUr
g3P/pCACj1PoFAlEqY97jpQ3n+HagkqFxA6nbWCmxq5l21tCBMv4Tx+iyjs7N/FZ
gQjLBQH5ocmhSrauSCaIhbsfTbArRXH7Kn42c3e79FNxwTn2lKDXKSESu0ioGPc=
=6bWt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5526F0F0.7060507>