From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 17:53:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F029416A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:53:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 326F143D49 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:53:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 32134 invoked by uid 0); 7 Jun 2005 17:53:16 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp1.knology.net with SMTP; 7 Jun 2005 17:53:16 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 2806065AB; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:53:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:53:03 -0500 From: David Kelly To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20050607175303.GA96525@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <42A4FD3F.70407@pacific.net.sg> <44y89mb1e0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44y89mb1e0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apple moving to x86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:53:19 -0000 On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:03:03PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Jared writes: > > > I have heard rumors of this, I hope they do, at least make the mac x86 > > compliant. > > That's their plan. It was in the business section of my morning paper > today. No, that is NOT Apple's plan. Apple's plan is to use Intel CPUs. It has nothing to do with "make the mac x86 compliant" or to use commodity PC hardware. I think Apple will cause the PC market to clean up their act. To make hardware that actually does what it says it will do. Something Microsoft either never understood or lacked the guts to enforce. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.