Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 May 2000 11:05:47 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Proper uses for MFS?
Message-ID:  <20000525110546.C28594@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <200005251705.NAA67491@blackhelicopters.org>; from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 01:05:02PM -0400
References:  <200005251705.NAA67491@blackhelicopters.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> [000525 10:40] wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm writing an article on Memory File System, just because I think
> it's massively cool.
> 
> We had a thread some time ago on why MFS wasn't useful for certain
> applications.  I searched through the mail archives, and found lots of things MFS wouldn't be right for, but not much of the other way around.  
> 
> What are some good, reasonable use for MFS nowadays?

Providing local space when there's no disk.

Providing a "don't care" partition where even though there's high
amounts of writing you'll newfs it at reboot anyway.

Our installer. :)

However with softupdates and the shared vm/buffercache MFS is less
useful nowadays.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000525110546.C28594>