Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:07:06 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: Bruce Simpson <bms@fastmail.net>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r284198 - head/bin/ls Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomyoF=egqDD-R%2Biun-LtRhrGK3p8%2BSrd5uzC6gGHQmMDg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <887CD9C6-9807-48AF-A7A6-B33F91901414@gmail.com> References: <201506100127.t5A1RdX6051959@svn.freebsd.org> <20150612204309.11dd3391@kan> <20150613024916.GA98218@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1434208622.1415.57.camel@freebsd.org> <C88CB169-12FE-4692-92AA-5C7D41BB61DF@FreeBSD.org> <557C661F.8080104@freebsd.org> <860017ED-D754-450C-865D-2D81A30C2212@xcllnt.net> <CAG=rPVd93Q18aYnSGSf_QH4C08RCq5wsdKQSNYTgWQ2huTbUHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150614100045.GF58397@zxy.spb.ru> <557D55CB.5050009@fastmail.net> <20150614171031.GA5857@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <557DCBED.2010804@fastmail.net> <CAJ-VmoktZTMnva02rTojZeGcd3q5BJ9RHGUHgFA=Ghn=WOxQyw@mail.gmail.com> <887CD9C6-9807-48AF-A7A6-B33F91901414@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 June 2015 at 12:02, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:53, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> We have busybox already - it's called bsdbox, and it's in base, and
>> we're already using it, and yes, it does pull in libxo. :)
>>
>> I'm not worried about the size increase of libxo. That's the wrong
>> thing to focus on. If it gets much more bloated then I'll poke people
>> with the big "what are you thinking" stick. The issues people have
>> aren't size related, they're "this API needs improvement and we have
>> bugs introduced into tools."
>>
>> I do like how zero percent of the comments are "hey, maybe we need
>> unit tests that run these tools and ensure they output the right
>> stuff." If this were ${WORK} and I were ${BOSS}, I'd have asked the
>> libxo developers to include unit tests before/after for each thing
>> they broke, so we don't have a repeat of this kind of thing. But, this
>> apparently isn't ${WORK} and I definitely don't want to be anyones
>> boss, so..
>
> Ugh. I'll write the tests ;(...
I'm not your boss!
(but if you go and do it - great! thankyou! This is what should've
been neckbearded, not the rest of the thread!)
-a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomyoF=egqDD-R%2Biun-LtRhrGK3p8%2BSrd5uzC6gGHQmMDg>