From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 23 11:34:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E145F16A403 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-questions@schottelius.org) Received: from schottelius.org (natgw.netstream.ch [62.65.128.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D011743D75 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:34:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-questions@schottelius.org) Received: (qmail 14213 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Oct 2006 11:33:34 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:33:33 +0200 From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius To: Patrik Jansson Message-ID: <20061023113333.GA22430@schottelius.org> References: <20061018141753.GA12559@schottelius.org> <45372B7C.9010201@aleborg.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45372B7C.9010201@aleborg.se> User-Agent: echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 X-Linux-Info: http://linux.schottelius.org/ X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.18-1-486 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACL: Default and other problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:34:21 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Patrik Jansson [Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:38:36AM +0200]: > I would also like to know if there's a in-depth ACL documentation. I > posted a question about ACLs because I'm having difficulties setting up > default ACLs. My question was posted 11/10 but I haven't got an answer > yet. Looks like noone is really using ACLs (and default ACLs) on fbsd. I am currently using some git-hooks to set the permissions on every update, but I am thinking about replacing the server with Linux using jfs or ext3 as filesystem, because those are tested and working with default ACLs. And without the need to readd the already existent permissions. Nico --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFPKiNuL75KpiFGIwRAoi1AJkBwAlXz2UGh9/oIZFyJZ5V5yIDUwCgxHke 6qXCquQQgePZfeiy2xeGCZE= =JGkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--