Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:15:27 -0400 From: Joshua Lee <yid@softhome.net> To: "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> Cc: dave@jetcafe.org, tlambert2@mindspring.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why did evolution fail? Message-ID: <20020903211527.1a0655b6.yid@softhome.net> In-Reply-To: <20020903144201.Q66978-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan> References: <200209021141.g82Bf7157514@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> <20020903144201.Q66978-100000@Tolstoy.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:57:11 -0700 (PDT) "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@directvinternet.com> wrote: > naturalism as a viable worldview. In fact, if naturalism is false its > opposite, supernaturalism must be true. > > Moreover, not just any supernaturalism will do. It must provide the > preconditions for rationality, ethics, science, human dignity, > freedom, intellectual disagreements, etc. Exactly. Judaism. What, that wasn't the religion you had in mind? ;-) The problem with these sorts of philosophical conjectures is that if, despite Kant's objections, they could be proven; they rarely prove any particular religion's cogence. Somehow I knew that since the subject line contained the word "evolution" that the missionaries would come out of the woodwork. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020903211527.1a0655b6.yid>